Justice in India does not end with the last order of the High Court.
The Constitution, in its profound wisdom, created one final constitutional safeguard — Article 136, which empowers the Supreme Court of India to intervene where law may have been followed but justice has been denied.
This extraordinary jurisdiction finds its expression in the Special Leave Petition (SLP) — a constitutional remedy that transforms the Supreme Court into the final guardian of justice, fairness, and equality.
Having practiced as an Advocate-on-Record for over two decades, I have learned that Article 136 is not merely a legal provision — it is the soul of the Special Leave Petition and the heartbeat of constitutional justice.
Article 136 of the Constitution of India empowers the Supreme Court to grant “special leave to appeal” from any judgment, decree, determination, sentence, or order passed by any court or tribunal in the country.
This wide jurisdiction allows the Court to correct gross miscarriages of justice even when no statutory appeal is available.
The framers of the Constitution intentionally kept the wording broad, ensuring that the Special Leave Petition could act as a safety valve — to protect against rigid technicalities and ensure that justice always finds its way to the top.
Article 136 ensures that no wrong decision can permanently close the doors of justice.
The Special Leave Petition derives its life and power from Article 136.
Without this constitutional provision, there would be no SLP jurisdiction, no final remedy, and no national uniformity in interpretation of law.
Through Article 136, the Supreme Court can review any case — civil, criminal, service, constitutional, or commercial — where injustice appears evident.
It makes the Supreme Court the first court of conscience, not merely the last court of appeal.
Thus, the Special Leave Petition is not a privilege; it is a constitutional blessing — one that ensures law remains a tool of justice, not its obstacle.
The power under Article 136 is wide, but it is not unlimited.
The Supreme Court exercises this jurisdiction sparingly and selectively.
It is meant to be invoked only in exceptional cases involving:
The Special Leave Petition cannot be used as a routine second appeal.
It is reserved for matters that carry constitutional, public, or legal significance beyond individual disputes.
Article 136 is not an open door — it is a constitutional gate that opens only for justice.
Over the decades, landmark judgments have shaped the contours of Article 136 and the Special Leave Petition jurisdiction.
The Supreme Court has repeatedly emphasized that this power must be used to correct lawlessness in legal process, not to reopen factual findings.
From cases on personal liberty to landmark commercial disputes, the Special Leave Petition has emerged as the thread that weaves consistency across India’s diverse judicial landscape.
It harmonizes conflicting interpretations, ensures uniform justice, and upholds the rule of law.
Every Special Leave Petition under Article 136 must be filed through an Advocate-on-Record (AOR) — a qualified professional authorized by the Supreme Court to act and plead before it.
The AOR ensures that the petition:
This safeguard ensures that only deserving cases reach the Bench — preserving both the purity of Article 136 and the prestige of the Court.
Article 136 breathes justice; the Advocate-on-Record ensures it breathes correctly.
Every citizen — whether a public servant, entrepreneur, or private individual — benefits from the existence of Article 136.
It guarantees that no injustice is final, no error beyond correction, and no right without remedy.
For High Court lawyers, it represents the bridge to the nation’s highest court.
For entrepreneurs, it ensures commercial fairness and contractual integrity.
For individuals, it embodies the promise that justice is not exhausted until it is examined by the Supreme Court.
The Special Leave Petition under Article 136 thus unites all Indians under one constitutional umbrella — the faith that justice ultimately prevails.
Despite its vast power, the Supreme Court practices restraint in exercising Article 136 jurisdiction.
It refuses to entertain frivolous or repetitive petitions and discourages misuse of the Special Leave Petition process.
This self-regulation strengthens public faith in the system, ensuring that only matters of true significance receive the Court’s attention.
For practitioners, this means the key to success lies not in frequency but in framing the right question of law with precision and purpose.
Many of India’s most influential judgments have begun as Special Leave Petitions — defining fundamental rights, clarifying statutes, and shaping governance.
This process illustrates how Article 136 serves as both protector of individual justice and architect of constitutional evolution.
Every time the Supreme Court grants special leave, it adds a new dimension to the country’s legal heritage.
Thus, the Special Leave Petition is both a remedy and a reform — one that continuously renews the moral authority of the law.
At its core, Article 136 reflects the Indian philosophy of dharma — justice as balance, fairness, and truth.
It ensures that human error never becomes final and that the system remains compassionate, not mechanical.
Each Special Leave Petition filed under this article reaffirms faith that justice in India is guided not just by statute, but by spirit.
Law decides; justice heals — and Article 136 connects the two.
Article 136 stands as one of the most extraordinary provisions in the world’s constitutional history.
It transforms the Supreme Court from a court of appeal into a court of conscience.
Through the Special Leave Petition, it empowers every citizen — regardless of power, position, or privilege — to seek the highest form of justice.
In my years of practice, I have learned that Article 136 is not merely about law — it is about faith in justice itself.
It ensures that India’s judicial system, though vast and complex, never loses sight of its central mission: to protect truth and fairness.
The Special Leave Petition is the heartbeat of Article 136 — and Article 136 is the soul of justice in India.
Disclaimer:
This article is purely for educational and informational purposes. It does not constitute legal advice or professional solicitation. It aims to promote awareness of the constitutional importance of Article 136 and its connection with Special Leave Petitions before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, in full compliance with the Bar Council of India Rules.
Agree Disagree